$ 11.00 · 4.6 (326) · In stock
The lawsuit says Thinx underwear, long marketed as safe and sustainable, contains harmful chemical substances known as PFAS. The company denies those allegations but will pay up to $5 million.
PFAs in Thinx Underwear: Health Risks, Lawsuit & Settlement
Fun & Draconian Tricks For A Happy, Equitable, Green World
Thinx 'non-toxic' period panties settles $5M lawsuit over harmful chemicals
PFAS pollution could last millennia. Ky. officials told the polluter, but not residents
Thinx Settled a Lawsuit Claiming Its Period Underwear Contains Potentially Harmful Chemicals
Thinx to pay up to $5 million to settle claims its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - ABC News
Thinx to pay millions to settle class-action lawsuit alleging its period underwear contained potentially harmful chemicals
What to know about PFAS after Thinx underwear settles class-action lawsuit - ABC News
Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National
The latest 'forever chemical' PFAS lawsuit is coming from Tennessee
Thinx settles lawsuit over period underwear marketing: What to know - The Washington Post
You May Qualify for Compensation After Exposure to PFAS